Free key
measurement

The biggest channels are not the most recommended ones

Ranking 5,177 channels by subscribers and by inbound recommendations produces two almost disjoint lists.

5 Sept 2026

There are two ways to ask which Telegram channel matters most in a topic. They give different answers, and the less obvious one is more useful.

Subscribers measure accumulated audience

It is the number everyone quotes because it is the number Telegram shows. It rewards age, virality and whatever the channel did two years ago, and it is nearly impossible to lose.

Inbound recommendations measure current standing

Telegram places channels beside one another. Count how often a channel appears in other channels' lists and you get a measure of where it sits in its neighbourhood right now — independent of how large it grew.

Across the index those two rankings barely overlap. The largest channels frequently have low inbound degree, because Telegram places giants beside other giants and there are not many. Mid-sized channels in dense niches accumulate far more edges.

Which to use

If you are buying reach, subscribers. If you are trying to find the channel that anchors a subject — the one whose neighbours are all the other channels you care about — inbound degree, every time.

Telegram publishes the outbound direction and not the inbound one, so this measure only exists if somebody crawls the graph and turns it around. The current ranking, recalculated weekly.

Run the same measurements yourself

Free tier, no card. Every figure above came from one endpoint on a weekly schedule.

Get a free API key
Reading

More notes